POLEMIK: GARIS-GARIS BESAR HALUAN NEGARA (GBHN) DAN RENCANA PEMBANGUNAN JANGKA PANJANG (RPJP), DAN EKSISTENSI MPR
The development of the reality of politics and democracy in Indonesia in the reform era, with the direct election of the Presidential Election ended the Presidential Election through the MPR, while providing the President's vision and mission opportunity during the campaign as a reference in running the wheels of government. This constitutional change also has a spirit of constitutional democracy in Indonesia, after the 1945 Amendment has put the principle of constitutional supremacy in place of parliamentary supremacy, and has an impact on the shrinking role and authority of the MPR. But the polemic that was present in the community, regarding the absence of the State Policy that the country's development plans were considered inconsistent and sustainable because only based on the vision and mission of the presidential candidates during the campaign. So that also raises the desire to bring back the GBHN because it considers that with the GBHN, the country's strategic development is no longer determined by the tastes and interests of the regime itself. Consequently, the existence of the MPR was also planned to be strengthened again. This article analyzes the two polemics between the State Policy and the GBHN accompanied by an analysis of the existence of the MPR.